Commitment to Perjury

Revelations of the first Impeachment of President Trump

During a quick sweep of the Department of State’s FOIA Library after an October 29, 2021 release, I began this journey of creating a substack in attempts to garner awareness and support for the findings I observe, as the task is cumbersome and requires motivation. The State Dept routinely releases email communications and documents exchanged between agency employees at the end of each month. Though they have a monthly, seemingly methodical FOIA release strategy, the substantive material released monthly is a FOIA emesis, containing material old and new. Intentionally and knowingly, the practice of the State Department is to authorize the availability of thousands of documents which one easily would surmise to be extremely broad in scope of the timeline, relevance, and overall theme.

..So let’s begin.

Below are some of my observations from the October 29, 2021 State Department Email release:

Fiona Hill receiving and replying to emails about “the call” between President Trump and President Zelensky of Ukraine, on July 9, 2019. “The call” in which the Democrats would use to file articles of Impeachment against President Donald J. Trump.

The key is the date of July 9, 2019.

As we know, “the call” took place on July 25, 2019.



Then we have the recorded testimony of Fiona Hill to President Trump’s counsel during the Impeachment hearings..link for testimony clip of Fiona Hill on my original pilled.net topic.

https://share-link.pilled.net/topic-detail/345571

So let’s break these findings down.

Yes, perjury to the United States Congress is a felony but does Congress ever submit criminal referrals to the DOJ when such felonies are apparent or found?

If you have caught any of the LARP congressional hearings just even in the past five years, you know the enumeration of those who have committed perjury is extensive.

Here is what makes this important:

Even if Fiona Hill is not indicted (or any of the rest of the diplomats, State employees etc) you have to ask a simple question. Why did they commit perjury over knowledge of “the call”?

Risk v. Benefit. Disliking a sitting United States President isn’t enough motive to risk prison time. What benefits would [they] garner?

The rabbit hole goes deep.

Proof of perjury creates a substantive foundation into motives, connections, and proofs to bring forth more charges.

Evidence for conspiracy charges, treason, and misprision of treason are apparent through direct and circumstantial means.

I believe in time justice will prevail.

Honest investigations take time.

The best prosecutors do not convene a grand jury until they are certain they have evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt for conviction. Hold the line.